For various reasons I haven’t been very musically active for the past year and a half. Recently I recalled that I had started working on orchestrating a Sibelius sonatine almost two years ago but couldn’t remember where I had put it. Yesterday I found it and decided to pick up where I had left off. It was an odd experience. I recalled vividly many of the ideas that I had penned. I think this is a good thing because it shows a certain consistency; that is, there were still ideas I agreed with. It would have been frustrating to go back to ideas that I no longer thought were relevant or interesting. I studied this particular sonatine during my last year at MUN, and I still enjoy listening to it. I decided to arrange it for orchestra for two main reasons: 1) studying and playing it lent a certain insight that would have been missing if I hadn’t known it as intimately, and 2) I believed the piece had colours and ideas that could be exploited with an orchestra.
I’ve completed the first draft of the first movement, with minor revisions already to what I had written last year. But as I moved forward I ran into some interesting situations. Yesterday and today I came to the point in arranging where I was working with material that was now repeating in the piece. My dilemma was thus: do I go back and look at what I did for the similar section already and copy it? Is that considered “cheating?” I didn’t want two similar sounding parts being at odds with each other within the same piece, particularly when it is so short. I could try to remember what I had done, or come up with a different take on it. However, I would eventually be entering it into notation software and see what I had already written anyway. Would I lose integrity by “copying” my previous work? Would the music lose its integrity?
In the end I decided in favour of consistency. Even if I had continued on and devised contrasting material for similar sections, I would have seen in them side by side eventually, and most likely one of them would have had to leave. This situation aside, I will still run into consistency problems once I’ve laid all the parts out. After all, it is only a first draft, with two halves being written so far apart. When I started it, I would have had very specific ideas, and I was immersed in that music at the time. I think this is why some of the ideas stood out so strongly for me and I could still hear the sounds I had imagined. My main goal this time around was to get my brain thinking musically again. I found it surprisingly easy to get back into, in terms of productivity. There have been plenty of times when I have attempted to pick up where I left off a piece. Usually I cannot get myself into the mindset of composer; it’s as if I’ve been removed from the piece long enough that I’m just a listener now. I hear the ideas—some of them I like, some of them I know shouldn’t be there. But I’m at a loss for what to do. And sometimes I’ll return to the state I was in when I was last working; I’ll tweak what’s there and then stare at the notes for a while. I wonder what will happen with those ideas.
No comments:
Post a Comment